Kevin also had a second question touching on the same topic: In fact, it’s a whole lot better than f/4 and you’ll see a big difference between them even though they’re both considered open apertures. Take this image as an example: A wide aperture was used to blur out the background treesĪ wide aperture such as f/2.8 is also ideal for night photography. Using a wide aperture is a great way to emphasize the focus on a specific object. Yes, f/7.1-f/11 will result in the in-focus parts being at the sharpest (as Kevin said, a good depth of field throughout) but that’s not always what we’re looking for in an image.įor example, if you’re photographing in a foggy forest and there’s one tree that stands out, you can use a wide aperture such as f/2.8 to make the background/surroundings soft. Do You Need f/2.8 for Landscape Photography?Įven though the sweet spot is at f/11, it doesn’t mean that’s the best aperture for all images. As I talk about in our Introduction to Aperture in Landscape Photography, an aperture such as f/22 will have more of the image in focus but it won’t be as sharp as an aperture such as f/8.Ī wide aperture such as f/2.8 or f/4 results in less of the image being in focus but the in-focus parts are sharper than what they would have been at a more narrow aperture. This range has the apertures which result in the overall sharpest images. A faster lens with an aperture of f/2.8 will have its sweet spot between f/5.6 and f/8. For a lens with the widest aperture of f/4, that means the sweet spot is between f/8 and f/11. The sweet spot of a lens is located two to three steps out from the widest aperture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |